What Percent Of Companies Use Animal Testing
- 100's of millions of creature tests are performed each year
- Prc and the USA are the worst proponents of animal testing
- The EU has had a cosmetic testing ban in place since 2013
Animal Testing Facts and Statistics Overview
The number of animals used in unnecessary, cruel testing continues to be extraordinary.
Whilst the exact figures are hard to come up by – understandable when you consider the negative PR countries and companies know they'll receive – it's important to the states that we shed a low-cal on industries that go along to profit from such vile practices.
Peculiarly ones like cosmetics – vanity industries where there'southward absolutely no need to test whatever product on animals. That's why we shine a calorie-free on so many wonderful cruelty-free companies – that nosotros've tested, trust and thoroughly recommend.
Top eleven Most Frightening Animal Testing Facts and Statistics
one. It is estimated that the Usa performs well over 100 million tests on fauna each year
Considering America's Fauna Welfare Act (AWA) doesn't include the animals that are primarily used for testing – rats, mice and fish – the figures are wildly underestimated. The latest figures accounted for 780,070 tests.Whereas the number is more probable effectually the 115 million marker.
2. Just over twenty% of the world's countries have corrective national testing bans in place
41 countries have completely banned cosmetic testing on animals –this includes all of the European union– whilst another 17 are working on it.
3. Animal testing in Australia increased by 148% between 2015 – 2017
Whilst Commonwealth of australia has recently implemented a national cosmetic testing ban, Queensland recorded over 12 million tests on domestic fowl in 2017 without a specified purpose.
You tin find out more than about creature testing in Australia here.
4. More than xc% of compounds tested on animals fail to enter the market
More recent studies estimate animal testing has a 96% failure charge per unit every bit it'south predictability has reduced.
5. Some animal tests have years to complete and cost multiple millions of dollars
Rodent cancer studies are particularly expensive and time-consuming. They tin can cost $2 – four meg per two-species lifetime report.
6. There are 50 validated and – in part – accepted alternatives to animate being testing
Typically alternatives to animal testing are incredibly constructive at reducing the number of animals used as they're more cost and time-efficient. In some cases they can exist 97% more cost effective (see rat 24 month bioassay vs Syrian hamster embryo (SHE) prison cell transformation examination).
vii. The U.s.a. spend nigh $xx billion of taxpayers money every year on animal testing
47% of the NIH'southward upkeep for all testing projects in the The states is spent on funding beast testing.
8. 84,100 animals died in the UK in 2019 as a issue of animal testing
9. Almost 700,000 animals died across the Eu in 2017 as a result of beast testing
Of the x,664,752 procedures performed on animals across the EU in 2017, 6.iv% were not-recoverable and a further 10.vii% (1.xiv million) were classes equally'astringent.'
10. 100% of HIV vaccines that passed animal tests failed in humans
Of the about 100 HIV vaccines that passed animal tests, none of them proved successful in human trials.
After HIV vaccine gp120 failed in clinical trials, a BMJ article distinguished how the important differences between NHPs (not-human primates) and humans had led researchers downwardly a doomed path.
11. 79% of people say they would switch if they institute out a brand tested products on animals
Even so nevertheless brands continue to go down this road – Source: BUAV Poll
How Many Animals are Tested on each year Globally?
Ultimately 100's of millions of animals are tested on each year.
The worst proponents of fauna testing are Cathay, The United states, Australia and Nihon. Significantly. It is likely these 4 countries make up over l% of all tests on animals beyond the earth.
Number of Beast Tests Performed past Country
The ix Countries that perform the most Tests on Animals each yr
| Country | Number of Animal Tests per Yr |
| USA** | 100 – 120 1000000 |
| Cathay* | 24 one thousand thousand |
| Australia*** | 20 one thousand thousand |
| Japan | 18 meg |
| Canada | three.viii million |
| Republic of korea | 3.7 million |
| United kingdom | three.4 million |
| Germany | two.8 million |
| France | one.9 million |
| (Eu | 10.9 million) |
*Mainland china is notoriously hard to assemble beast testing statistics from as it'southward quite a closed book. However we took data from Cruelty Complimentary International and applied a 20% increment – an increment in line with the rest of the countries on our listing (excluding the UK)
**The USA is equally difficult to extrapolate authentic animal testing information. According to the US Government statistics, but 780,070 animals were used in tests – a 5.seven% increase from 2017. But as the Usa has no ban in identify, these statistics do not include all animals. About mice, rats, and fish are not covered by the Animal Welfare Deed – though they are still covered past other regulations that protect animal welfare. And so the broad ranging figure of up to 120 one thousand thousand is a all-time judge for the number of animals used in U.s.a. laboratories.
***Australian animal testing has exploded in recent years. This has been driven by the use of 12 meg domestic fowl in Queensland in 2017. The total number of animals used in 2017 (20.ii million) jumped from 12 million in 2016. Alarming figures to say the least.
How Many Countries Have Animal Testing Bans in Place?
At that place are 40 Countries with National Corrective Testing Bans in place as of 2021. Which is 20.v% of the world's nations.
So in that location are a further 17 countries working on implementing bans – another viii.7%. What complicates the issue are countries like Brazil and The USA where there are fractional bans in place. And we mean fractional.
In Brazil, merely half dozen of the 26 states take canonical a ban for cosmetic animal testing. And the USA is even worse. In America, only 5 states have banned cosmetic animal testing.
Countries similar Canada notwithstanding don't accept any bans on cosmetic animal testing.
Beast Testing Statistics in the UK
Testing cosmetic products and their ingredients on animals was banned in the UK in 1998 every bit part of EU Regulation 1223/2009 (cosmetics regulation).
The ban was created because non-creature methods were developed to test the safety of the cosmetics AND vanity products cannot be classed in the same bracket as testing on legitimate medical products.
You can read more about the UK's animal testing policy here.
See how theEuropean Cosmetics Directivedefines a cosmetic or vanity product:
"Any substance or training intended to be placed in contact with the various external parts of the human body (epidermis, hair organization, nails, lips and external genital organs) or with the teeth and the mucous membranes of the oral fissure with a view exclusively or mainly to cleaning them, perfuming them, irresolute their appearance and/or correcting body odours and/or protecting them or keeping them in expert condition."
— European Cosmetics Directive
4 Major Animal Testing Facts and Statistics in the United kingdom of great britain and northern ireland
Every year the Great britain regime publishes a report on the scientific procedures that occur on living animals.
This gives us the opportunity to analyse the current state of play in our own country and to see how animal testing has developed over the years.
- 3,400,000 Procedures on animals in 2019
- 86% of the animals were mice, fish and rats
- xvi,100 Personal licenses handed out to examination on animals
- 84,100 Animals died as a result
Now, there are iii licences required by the Animals (Scientific Procedures) Deed 1986 earlier testing on animals is allowed. The 3 licences needed are:
- A personal licence for each person carrying out procedures on animals
- A project licence for the programme of work
- An establishment licence for the place at which the piece of work is carried out
And so whilst the number of tests are reducing slowly beyond the UK, the number of applications forpersonal licenses is, at all-time, concerning.
Animal Testing Facts and Statistics in The European union
- The UK runs the most tests on animals in the European union, followed by France and Germany
- six.iv% of all animal tests were non-recoverable – the bailiwick died
- In 2017 there were over 10 one thousand thousand tests on animals in the EU
Since 2013 the EU has implemented a ban on cosmetic creature testing.
However there are still millions of animals built-in specifically for testing each year and – between 2013 and 2017 – the number of authorised projects has increased by 176%.
And during this timeframe, the number ofinspections – announced or unannounced – barely increased at all. As 70% of adults in European union countries hold that replacing animal testing with non-animal methods should be an Eu priority, we will go along to
iv Beast Testing Statistics in the Eu
- 10,664,752 Procedures on animals in 2017
- 92% of the animals were mice, fish and rats
- 6.four% of all tests performed were non-recoverable
- 10.vii% of all tests performed were classed as 'severe'
What Animals were used for Animal Tests in the EU
In 2017, the main species used (for the get-go time) in research and testing in the European union were: mice, fish, rats and birds.
Which together represented 92% of the total number of animals while species of detail public concern (dogs, cats and not-human primates) represented less than 0.3% of the total number of animals. The aforementioned amount every bit amphibians, cephalopods and reptiles.
But every bit the number of brute tests across the European union has increased by xvi% between 2017 – 2020, we can apply the same increase to get estimates (albeit accurate estimates) for how many animals were used for the first time in 2020:
- Mice: half dozen.half-dozen million
- Fish: 1.4 million
- Rats: 1.28 one thousand thousand
- Birds: 0.64 million
Animal Testing Facts and Statistics in The USA
- The U.s. arguably has the worst and to the lowest degree transparent fauna testing policy
- The Animal Welfare Act (AWA) doesn't embrace mice, rats or fish – the nigh widely used animals in research
- Estimates put the number of animals used in fauna testing at well over 100 million per year
- 99% of animals involved in tests aren't included in the Animal Welfare Human action
- $19.6 billion spent by the NIH on brute research and testing in 2020
- 90% of animals aren't included in official statistics
- 7% of animals weren't given any hurting relief
In 2019, U.s. government statistics put the number of laboratory animals used in inquiry at 797,546, an increment of two.ii% from 2018.
Nonetheless, because these statistics practise not include mice, rats, and fish- animals non covered by the Brute Welfare Act – they are wildly inaccurate. Estimates claim that the number of mice and rats alone is 111.v million.
We have a more than detailed breakup on animal testing in the The states here.
Public Perception Statistics of Animate being Testing
Americans…
Who oppose animal testing for scientific purposes
52%
Source: Pew Research
If a make tested on animals…
79% Of people would switch
Source: BUAV Poll
In the Uk…
38% Believe that cosmetic testing is legal
Source: Section for Energy, Business & Industrial Strategy – Public Attitudes to Creature Inquiry
65% of the British Public can take animal testing for medical research…
IF there's no culling
Source: Department for Energy, Business & Industrial Strategy – Public Attitudes to Animal Inquiry
Those who believe that cosmetic testing on animals is permitted in the UK are just every bit probable as the remainder of the public to say they can take the use of animals in medical research. This context-driven nature of back up for fauna research needs to be well-documented.
If we're all more aware of societal laws and in particular the ample number of alternatives to animal testing, we can motion towards a kinder world that no longer supports animal testing in whatsoever forms.
What % of Animal Tests are even 'Successful?'
- A test could last up to ii years and there could exist 2,000 animals involved
- More than than 90% of compounds inbound clinical trials fail to proceeds regulatory blessing
- Testing a single active pesticide ingredient takes a decade, costs approximately $71,000,000 and kills upward to 8,000 animals to consummate all of the animal studies required to register i single pesticide
For drug testing lone the boilerplate time to bring a production to market is x-15 years.
With a electric current failure rate of 90% – 55% due to a lack of efficacy and 28% due to the toxic effects in humans – the need for more efficient, sustainable technologies in adventure assessment over current paradigms is so blatant it'southward hard to encompass how such barbaric processes are kept alive.
What does the Future concur for Animate being Testing?
Information technology's not all doom and gloom. In that location are some initiatives designed to reduce the number of animals involved in testing around the world.
The Futurity of Animal Testing in The Us
EPA has moved away from requiring the testing of potentially harmful chemicals on animals. A decision that hasn't gone down well with numerous inquiry groups and environmentalists.
The E.P.A. Administrator Andrew Wheeler said the agency plans to reduce the amount of studies that involve mammal testing by xxx percent past 2025, and to eliminate the studies entirely by 2035.
"Nosotros are really excited as this has been something we've wanted for quite some time…The alternatives are the future. They're more efficient and save lives.."
— Kitty Block, President of the Humane Lodge of the U.s.a.
The Future of Animal Testing in China
Even China, a state lambasted for information technology's approach to animal testing, is looking at loosening steps regarding cosmetic testing on animals.
In July 2020 People's republic of china's National Medical Products Assistants (NMPA) began formulating new restrictions that are believed to elevator the beast testing requirement. One that requires any corrective sold in the country to be tested on animals.
Information technology's the reason why companies that sell in Mainland china cannever be labelled as cruelty-free. And why nosotros'd never trust brands who trade their humane responsibility for some quick yen.
Whilst it'southward unclear exactly what is likely to happen, we'll take whatever progress we tin regarding Cathay'south animal testing policies.
The Future of Animal Testing in The EU
So whilst testing cosmetics on animals has been banned in the U.k. since 1998 and the European union ban on animal tested cosmetic products was starting time passed in 1993 – with the full ban taking effect in 2013 – in that location are still millions of animal tests that occur each year.
x.ix million to exist verbal!
But according to data provided by Cruelty Costless Europe, 70% of adults in EU countries agree that replacing animal testing with non-animal methods should be an European union priority. With such strong public backing, we're confident that whatsoever non-essential animal testing will soon exist made illegal beyond all European union states.
Boosted Sources
The Canadian Council on Animal Care
Recherche Animale Research Statistics
Humane Guild International – Republic of korea
Laboratory Beast Statistics in Federal republic of germany
Source: https://redorangepeach.com/animal-cruelty/statistics/
Posted by: mcgaugheyaguied1981.blogspot.com
0 Response to "What Percent Of Companies Use Animal Testing"
Post a Comment